<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He may be on to something</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adultstemcellawareness.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/he-may-be-on-to-something/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adultstemcellawareness.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/he-may-be-on-to-something/</link>
	<description>Adult Stem Cell Awareness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: benotafraid</title>
		<link>http://adultstemcellawareness.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/he-may-be-on-to-something/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>benotafraid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adultstemcellawareness.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/he-may-be-on-to-something/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll get back to this in the evening, but if I&#039;ve understood correctly, what is being heralded is not the cloning, which clearly required eggs, but the cells that were taken from the clones - (skin cells, I think), which were not embryonic, but adult, and &quot;reprogrammed&quot; into a stage of plurpotency. This is the breakthrough that holds promise.

Editing -- wrong. Looking backwards, it was just a day or so later that the reprogramming news came out, even though Wilmut endorses it along with his announcement not to pursue human cloning. The jumble of important points was further jumbled by my reporting. The new of monkey cloning was just that - primates have been successfully cloned and very many eggs were used. The inefficiency of this process made direct programming a more attractive endeavor. Of course, days later, it would become even more attractive, with the news of Thomson and Yamanaka&#039;s success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll get back to this in the evening, but if I&#8217;ve understood correctly, what is being heralded is not the cloning, which clearly required eggs, but the cells that were taken from the clones &#8211; (skin cells, I think), which were not embryonic, but adult, and &#8220;reprogrammed&#8221; into a stage of plurpotency. This is the breakthrough that holds promise.</p>
<p>Editing &#8212; wrong. Looking backwards, it was just a day or so later that the reprogramming news came out, even though Wilmut endorses it along with his announcement not to pursue human cloning. The jumble of important points was further jumbled by my reporting. The new of monkey cloning was just that &#8211; primates have been successfully cloned and very many eggs were used. The inefficiency of this process made direct programming a more attractive endeavor. Of course, days later, it would become even more attractive, with the news of Thomson and Yamanaka&#8217;s success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://adultstemcellawareness.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/he-may-be-on-to-something/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adultstemcellawareness.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/he-may-be-on-to-something/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see where Miltalipov is NOT using eggs - here&#039;s a quote from the article mentioned on the NR article&#039;s link:

&quot;Mitalipov credits their use of a machine called Oosight, which allows them to see the structures in the egg that carry DNA, thereby easing its extraction – the first step in nuclear transfer.

Conventionally, researchers have used a dye called Hoechst and ultraviolet light to locate and remove an egg&#039;s DNA. But Mitalipov&#039;s group found that both the light and the dye damaged the egg. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see where Miltalipov is NOT using eggs &#8211; here&#8217;s a quote from the article mentioned on the NR article&#8217;s link:</p>
<p>&#8220;Mitalipov credits their use of a machine called Oosight, which allows them to see the structures in the egg that carry DNA, thereby easing its extraction – the first step in nuclear transfer.</p>
<p>Conventionally, researchers have used a dye called Hoechst and ultraviolet light to locate and remove an egg&#8217;s DNA. But Mitalipov&#8217;s group found that both the light and the dye damaged the egg. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmos-Liturgy-Sex &#187; News on the Adult Stem Cell Front</title>
		<link>http://adultstemcellawareness.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/he-may-be-on-to-something/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmos-Liturgy-Sex &#187; News on the Adult Stem Cell Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adultstemcellawareness.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/he-may-be-on-to-something/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] posts some interesting news on the recently reported monkey embryonic stem cell research advances and a recent surprise by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts some interesting news on the recently reported monkey embryonic stem cell research advances and a recent surprise by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
